Post a comment
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Oh boy. So you think it's about the camera? I think you got it all backwards. Overemphasizing the importance of the equipment is a sure route to disappointment.
I don't know Judy but I guess she's (a) using cheapo cameras (like $20 cheap) and crossdeveloped film, or (b) emulating the look in photoshop from files made in cameras decent enough to produce raw-format images. Doesn't have to be the least fancy, even if Judy's camera is.
Posted by: Christer | October 14, 2006 at 09:47 AM
Oh I don't mean to credit the camera for the photos. That's the "talent" part. But I can't do much of what's shown in that set with my p'n's Panasonic.
Posted by: Stewf | October 14, 2006 at 09:58 PM
Believe me, you can.
Posted by: Christer | October 17, 2006 at 04:45 AM